Water Utility

Whitworth Water District 2

Location Spokane County, Washington,
WA
Serves 26,883
Source Groundwater
PWS ID WA5396601

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 3.15 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
788x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.324 ppb No Legal Limit
16x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.53 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
11x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 1.69 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
12x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.17 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
3.4x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb
This Utility: 7.99 ppt No Legal Limit
1,141x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.007 ppb
This Utility: 44.1 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 0.04 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 0.18 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 0.473 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
40 ppb
This Utility: 7.99 ppt No Legal Limit
This Utility: 0.53 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
2000 ppt
This Utility: 0.413 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.383 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppt
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.3 ppt

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.164 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppt
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.09 ppt
This Utility: 0.695 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.131 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb
This Utility: 0.117 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb
This Utility: 0.333 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 1 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+7 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 6 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+11 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Nitrate
Nitrate and nitrite
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total PFOS and PFOA
Other Contaminants Detected
Barium
Fluoride
Manganese
Molybdenum
PFOS + PFOA + PFHxS + PFNA
Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS)
Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA)
Strontium*
Trichloroethylene
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.