Water Utility

Central Utah Water Conservancy District - Utah Valley

Location Utah County County, Utah,
UT
Source Surface water
PWS ID UTAH25112

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 3.64 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
910x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 4.9 ppb No Legal Limit
82x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 6.9 ppb No Legal Limit
17x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 3.4 ppb No Legal Limit
34x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 12.2 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
122x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.22 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
4.4x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 16.7 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
112x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb
This Utility: 95.7 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 19.5 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 1.9 ppb Legal Limit: 200 ppb
This Utility: 0.277 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 8.5 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.124 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppm
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppm
This Utility: 0.133 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppm
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppm
This Utility: 0.091 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
2000 ppt
This Utility: 0.033 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.34 ppb Legal Limit: 50 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
30 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 5 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+3 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 7 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+9 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Bromodichloromethane
Chloroform
Dibromochloromethane
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Other Contaminants Detected
Barium
Bromide
Cyanide
Fluoride
Manganese
Nitrate
Nitrate and nitrite
Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS)
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHPA)
Selenium

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.