Water Utility

Mexican Hat Special Service District

Location San Juan County County, Utah,
UT
Serves 40
Source Groundwater
PWS ID UTAH19008

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 1.1 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
275x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.59 ppb No Legal Limit
43x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 12.5 ppb No Legal Limit
31x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.35 ppb No Legal Limit
3.5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 1.5 ppb No Legal Limit
7.5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.2 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 3.81 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
38x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 681.9 ppb No Legal Limit
6.8x
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.45 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
9x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 46.4 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
309x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb

Trichloroacetic acid

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.31 ppb No Legal Limit
23x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 53.9 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
600 ppb
This Utility: 54.8 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 0.865 ppb Legal Limit: 400 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
200 ppb
This Utility: 0.365 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.03 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppm
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppm
This Utility: 0.433 ppb Legal Limit: 50 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
30 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 7 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+1 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 9 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+6 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Bromodichloromethane
Chloroform
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloroacetic acid
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Manganese
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Trichloroacetic acid
Other Contaminants Detected
Aluminum
Barium
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate
Fluoride
Nitrate
Selenium

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.