Water Utility

Spring Creek Water Users

Location Iron County County, Utah,
UT
Serves 204
Source Groundwater
PWS ID UTAH11052

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 1.6 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
400x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb
This Utility: 0.3 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
7.5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.04 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.417 ppb No Legal Limit
4.2x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.3 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
2.1x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 0.562 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
4x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.87 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
37x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb
This Utility: 0.3 ppb Legal Limit: 2 ppb
3x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.82 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
5.5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb
This Utility: 63.6 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
600 ppb
This Utility: 0.35 ppb Legal Limit: 6 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
1 ppb
This Utility: 19.2 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.0857 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
This Utility: 0.2 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb
This Utility: 0.242 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 1.4 ppb Legal Limit: 50 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
30 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 3 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+2 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 8 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+7 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Cadmium
Dibromochloromethane
Nitrate
Nitrate and nitrite
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Thallium
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Other Contaminants Detected
Aluminum
Antimony
Barium
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Fluoride
Selenium

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.