Water Utility

Woods Cross City Water System

Location Davis County County, Utah,
UT
Serves 11,500
Source Groundwater
PWS ID UTAH06021

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 0.6 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
150x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb
This Utility: 0.187 ppb No Legal Limit
6.2x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.03 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.308 ppb No Legal Limit
3.1x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.23 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
12x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 4.34 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
31x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.05 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
21x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.453 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
7.5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.29 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
15x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb
This Utility: 72.5 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.0267 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
This Utility: 0.657 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb
This Utility: 3.2 ppb Legal Limit: 200 ppb
This Utility: 26.1 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 1.22 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
53 ppb
This Utility: 0.72 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
2000 ppt
This Utility: 2.1 ppb Legal Limit: 50 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
30 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 5 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+4 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 8 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+8 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Dibromoacetic acid
Dibromochloromethane
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Nitrate
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Other Contaminants Detected
Barium
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Cyanide
Lithium
Monochloroacetic acid
Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS)
Selenium

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.