Water Utility

Bear River Wcd-harper Ward

Location Box Elder County County, Utah,
UT
Serves 390
Source Purchased groundwater
PWS ID UTAH02068

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 0.633 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
158x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.6 ppb No Legal Limit
43x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2 ppb No Legal Limit
5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.243 ppb No Legal Limit
12x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.2 ppb No Legal Limit
22x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.159 ppb No Legal Limit
2.6x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.525 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
3.8x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.37 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
7.4x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 6.8 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
45x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb
This Utility: 66.7 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 0.105 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb
This Utility: 123.8 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
210 ppb
This Utility: 3.5 ppb Legal Limit: 200 ppb
This Utility: 0.282 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 8.16 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 0.183 ppb Legal Limit: 50 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
30 ppb
This Utility: 0.147 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb
This Utility: 0.242 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 5 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+1 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 9 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+6 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Bromodichloromethane
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Dibromochloromethane
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Nitrate
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Other Contaminants Detected
Barium
Bromoform
Chlorate*
Cyanide
Fluoride
Manganese
Selenium
Strontium*
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.