Water Utility

Mountain Peak SUD

Location Ellis County, Texas,
TX
Serves 16,008
Source Purchased surface water
PWS ID TX0700042

Overview

Contaminants Detected

This Utility: 0.267 ppb Legal Limit: 3 ppb
2.7x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 4.85 ppb No Legal Limit
243x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 5.64 ppb No Legal Limit
94x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
This Utility: 1.71 ppb No Legal Limit
3.4x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb

Chlorite

Potential Effect: change in blood chemistry
This Utility: 449.5 ppb Legal Limit: 1000 ppb
9x
EWG's Health Guideline:
50 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 6.22 ppb No Legal Limit
16x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb
This Utility: 2.95 ppb No Legal Limit
98x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.03 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 4.67 ppb No Legal Limit
47x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 7.17 ppb No Legal Limit
36x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.2 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 13.9 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
139x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 32.4 ppb No Legal Limit
540x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.8 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppb
8.9x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.09 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.38 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
7.5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 23.1 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
154x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb

Trichloroacetic acid

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.46 ppb No Legal Limit
25x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 0.183 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 4.68 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
600 ppb
This Utility: 69 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 65 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
210 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.0195 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
This Utility: 105 ppb Legal Limit: 200 ppb
This Utility: 1.07 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 0.129 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 41.7 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 2.55 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 0.108 ppb Legal Limit: 2 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
1.2 ppb
This Utility: 0.0167 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 3.82 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
40 ppb
This Utility: 0.346 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
25 ppb
This Utility: 1.01 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
53 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.199 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppm
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppm
This Utility: 0.243 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
2000 ppt
This Utility: 1.98 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 1.15 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 1.01 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.443 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppt
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.3 ppt
This Utility: 0.936 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.08 ppb Legal Limit: 4 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 0.255 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb
This Utility: 0.203 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 14 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+12 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 15 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+22 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Atrazine*
Bromochloroacetic acid
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Chlorite
Chloroform
Dibromoacetic acid
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloroacetic acid
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Trichloroacetic acid
Other Contaminants Detected
1-Butanol
Aluminum
Barium
Chlorate*
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Cyanide
Fluoride
Germanium
Lithium
Manganese
Mercury (inorganic)
Metolachlor
Molybdenum
Monobromoacetic acid*
Monochloroacetic acid
Nitrate
Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS)
Perfluorobutanoic Acid (PFBA)
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHPA)
Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA)
Simazine
Strontium*
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.