Water Utility

White House Utility District

Location White House, Tennessee,
TN
Serves 104,872
Source Surface water
PWS ID TN0000745

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 5.35 ppb No Legal Limit
89x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 38 ppb No Legal Limit
95x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.109 ppb No Legal Limit
5.4x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
This Utility: 15.7 ppb No Legal Limit
79x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.2 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 34.6 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
346x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 42.9 ppb No Legal Limit
714x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.48 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
9.7x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 44 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
293x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb

Trichloroacetic acid

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 17.2 ppb No Legal Limit
172x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.0659 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 0.61 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 0.15 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 1.74 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
53 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.216 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppm
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppm
This Utility: 0.113 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb
This Utility: 0.4 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 7 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+2 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 9 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+5 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Bromodichloromethane
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Dichloroacetic acid
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Trichloroacetic acid
Other Contaminants Detected
Dibromochloromethane
Fluoride
Manganese
Monochloroacetic acid
Nitrate
Strontium*
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.