Water Utility

NJ American Water - Raritan

Location Elizabeth City, New Jersey,
NJ
Serves 615,430
Source Surface water
PWS ID NJ2004002

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 0.273 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
68x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Bromate*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.25 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
2.5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 7.51 ppb No Legal Limit
125x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 25.7 ppb No Legal Limit
64x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.242 ppb No Legal Limit
12x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
This Utility: 0.0893 ppb No Legal Limit
3x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.03 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.76 ppb No Legal Limit
18x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 8.19 ppb No Legal Limit
41x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.2 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 20.7 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
207x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 23 ppb No Legal Limit
384x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.25 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
9x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 1.25 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
9x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 2.2 ppt Legal Limit: 10 ppb
2,203x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.001 ppb
This Utility: 0.036 ppt Legal Limit: 10 ppb
6x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.006 ppb
This Utility: 3.8 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppb
13x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.3 ppb

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 7.49 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppb
83x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.09 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.14 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
2.8x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 35 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
233x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb

Trichloroacetic acid

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 12.4 ppb No Legal Limit
124x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

1,2,3-Trichloropropane*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.000391 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.0007 ppb
This Utility: 0.351 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.35 ppb
This Utility: 10 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
600 ppb
This Utility: 81.8 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 19.3 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 0.00333 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
This Utility: 0.0256 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb
This Utility: 126 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
210 ppb
This Utility: 0.0555 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 0.0468 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 8.7 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 5.62 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 1.5 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
40 ppb
This Utility: 1.41 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
2000 ppt
This Utility: 1.01 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 2.43 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.513 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb
This Utility: 0.26 ppb Legal Limit: 20 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.43 ppb
This Utility: 3.59 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 14 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+7 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 19 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+15 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Bromate*
Bromodichloromethane
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Dibromoacetic acid
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloroacetic acid
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Nitrate
Nitrate and nitrite
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Trichloroacetic acid
Other Contaminants Detected
1,2,3-Trichloropropane*
1,4-Dioxane
Aluminum
Barium
Bromide
Bromochloromethane
Bromoform
Chlorate*
Fluoride
Germanium
Lithium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS)
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHPA)
Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)
Strontium*
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.