Water Utility

Pine Hill Borough MUA

Location Pine Hill, New Jersey,
NJ
Serves 10,233
Source Purchased surface water
PWS ID NJ0428002

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 0.05 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
13x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Bromate*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.488 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
4.9x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.34 ppb No Legal Limit
22x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 3.53 ppb No Legal Limit
8.8x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.273 ppb No Legal Limit
14x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
This Utility: 0.0813 ppb No Legal Limit
2.7x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.03 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.56 ppb No Legal Limit
5.6x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 0.853 ppb No Legal Limit
4.3x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.2 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.47 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
15x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.2 ppb No Legal Limit
37x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.3 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
2.1x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 0.3 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
2.1x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 0.034 ppt Legal Limit: 10 ppb
34x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.001 ppb

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.424 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppb
4.7x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.09 ppb
This Utility: 0.019 ppt No Legal Limit
3.2x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.006 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.58 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
12x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 5.77 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
38x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb

Trichloroacetic acid

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.539 ppb No Legal Limit
5.4x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 0.00347 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
3 ppb

1,2,3-Trichloropropane*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.000486 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.0007 ppb
This Utility: 0.0538 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.35 ppb
This Utility: 0.0174 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 2.91 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
600 ppb
This Utility: 0.09 ppb Legal Limit: 7 ppb
This Utility: 56.7 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 0.00529 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
This Utility: 0.00364 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb
This Utility: 81.5 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
210 ppb
This Utility: 0.255 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
70 ppb
This Utility: 0.393 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 7.27 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 0.303 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
40 ppb
This Utility: 0.075 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
2000 ppt
This Utility: 0.041 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.602 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.329 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppt
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.3 ppt
This Utility: 0.299 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb
This Utility: 0.1 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 13 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+10 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 18 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+17 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Bromate*
Bromodichloromethane
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Dibromoacetic acid
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloroacetic acid
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Nitrate
Nitrate and nitrite
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnA)
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Trichloroacetic acid
Other Contaminants Detected
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane*
1,4-Dioxane
2-Methoxyethanol
Aluminum
Asbestos
Barium
Bromochloromethane
Bromoform
Chlorate*
Cobalt
Fluoride
Manganese
Molybdenum
Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS)
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHPA)
Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
Strontium*
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.