Water Utility

Johnson County PWSD 2

Location Holden, Missouri,
MO
Serves 11,652
Source Groundwater
PWS ID MO1024310

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.24 ppb No Legal Limit
21x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
This Utility: 1.42 ppb No Legal Limit
2.8x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.89 ppb No Legal Limit
19x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.91 ppb No Legal Limit
49x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.35 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
27x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 5.85 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
39x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb
This Utility: 20.1 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
600 ppb
This Utility: 102 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.457 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.035 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
This Utility: 0.39 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 29.6 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 1.9 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 0.008 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppm
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppm
This Utility: 0.355 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 5 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+1 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 6 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+8 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Dibromochloromethane
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Other Contaminants Detected
Aluminum
Barium
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Fluoride
Lithium
Manganese
Nitrate and nitrite
Strontium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.