Water Utility

Jackson County PWSD1

Location Grandview, Missouri,
MO
Serves 24,500
Source Purchased groundwater
PWS ID MO1024275

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 1.09 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
273x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.19 ppb No Legal Limit
37x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 4.53 ppb No Legal Limit
11x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.54 ppb No Legal Limit
127x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.603 ppb No Legal Limit
6x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 4.02 ppb No Legal Limit
20x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.2 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 4.21 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
42x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 7.07 ppb No Legal Limit
118x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 7.33 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
49x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb
This Utility: 66.8 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 0.14 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 36.1 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 3 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 3.04 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
40 ppb
This Utility: 0.21 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppm
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppm
This Utility: 0.219 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb

Trichloroacetic acid

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.187 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 1.64 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 7 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+1 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 9 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+7 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Bromodichloromethane
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloroacetic acid
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Other Contaminants Detected
Barium
Fluoride
Lithium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nitrate and nitrite
Strontium*
Trichloroacetic acid
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.