Overview
Legal does not necessarily equal safe.
- Getting a passing grade from the federal government does not mean the water meets the latest health guidelines.
- Legal limits for contaminants in tap water have not been updated in almost 20 years.
- The best way to ensure clean tap water is to keep pollution out of source water in the first place.
AquaPura's analysis shows 5 contaminant(s) detected in Wyandotte's water exceed recommended health guidelines, though they may be within legal limits set by the EPA.
Contaminants Detected
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.0865 ppb
No Legal Limit
4.3x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
0.02 ppb
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 13.8 ppb
Legal Limit: 60 ppb
138x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
0.1 ppb
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 20.8 ppb
No Legal Limit
346x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
0.06 ppb
This Utility: 0.077 ppt
Legal Limit: 10 ppb
77x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.001 ppb
0.001 ppb
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 18.3 ppb
Legal Limit: 80 ppb
122x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb
0.15 ppb
This Utility: 0.27 ppm
Legal Limit: 10 ppm
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppm
0.14 ppm
This Utility: 0.592 ppt
Legal Limit: 4 ppt
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.3 ppt
0.3 ppt
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.031 ppt
Legal Limit: 4 ppt
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.09 ppt
0.09 ppt
This Utility: 41 ppt
No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
1000 ppt
Find a Filter
See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.
Carbon Filters
Filters 4 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+3 others)
Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.
Pros
- Lower upfront cost
- Reduced maintenance
Cons
- Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 5 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+6 others)
Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.
Pros
- Most effective
Cons
- Higher upfront cost
- Requires more maintenance
- Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination
Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.
| Contaminant | Activated Carbon | Reverse Osmosis | Ion Exchange |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contaminants Above Health Guidelines | |||
| Chromium (hexavalent)* | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA9)* | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Other Contaminants Detected | |||
| Chlorate* | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Fluoride | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Manganese | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Nitrate | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Strontium* | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vanadium* | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
Protect your family's health.
Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.