Water Utility

Ocean Pines

Location Worcester County, Maryland,
MD
Serves 11,890
Source Groundwater
PWS ID MD0230005

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.81 ppb No Legal Limit
4.5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.913 ppb No Legal Limit
46x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.28 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
13x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.83 ppb No Legal Limit
47x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.39 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
9.9x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 1.69 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
12x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 7.79 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
52x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb
This Utility: 24.8 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 0.113 ppb Legal Limit: 4 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
1 ppb
This Utility: 162.6 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
210 ppb
This Utility: 0.99 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 0.85 ppb Legal Limit: 100 ppb
This Utility: 0.325 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
70 ppb
This Utility: 0.515 ppb Legal Limit: 400 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
200 ppb
This Utility: 0.005 ppb Legal Limit: 0.05 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.01 ppb
This Utility: 0.219 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
13 ppb
This Utility: 31.5 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 0.01 ppb Legal Limit: 2 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
1.2 ppb
This Utility: 0.102 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb
This Utility: 0.981 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 4 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+5 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 7 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+10 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Nitrate
Nitrate and nitrite
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Other Contaminants Detected
Barium
Beryllium
Chlorate*
Chloroethane
Chromium (total)
Cobalt
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate
Ethylene dibromide
MTBE
Manganese
Mercury (inorganic)
Strontium*
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.