Water Utility

Union County Water District

Location Union County, Kentucky,
KY
Serves 6,117
Source Purchased surface water
PWS ID KY1130433

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 0.0667 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
17x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 44.3 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
443x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.506 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
3.6x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 0.663 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppb
2.2x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.3 ppb

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.13 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppb
13x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.09 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.18 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
24x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 70.6 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
471x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb
This Utility: 0.09 ppb Legal Limit: 70 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
20 ppb
This Utility: 133.3 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
600 ppb
This Utility: 0.139 ppb Legal Limit: 3 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 35 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 0.778 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 0.893 ppt Legal Limit: 10 ppt
EWG's Health Guideline:
9 ppt
This Utility: 3 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 0.378 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
2000 ppt
This Utility: 0.338 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 1 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 4 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+6 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 7 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+9 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Nitrate
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Other Contaminants Detected
2,4-D
Aluminum
Atrazine*
Barium
Fluoride
Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA)
Manganese
Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS)
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHPA)
Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA)

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.