Water Utility

Stucker Fork Water Utility

Location Austin, Indiana,
IN
Serves 19,120
Source Surface water
PWS ID IN5272002

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 19.5 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
195x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 20.5 ppb No Legal Limit
341x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.516 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
3.7x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.13 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
2.6x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 38.4 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
256x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb
This Utility: 0.0833 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.35 ppb
This Utility: 0.0506 ppb Legal Limit: 3 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 59.3 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.005 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
This Utility: 0.633 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 0.52 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 1.98 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
40 ppb
This Utility: 0.127 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb
This Utility: 0.0357 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 3 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+1 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 5 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+7 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Nitrate
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Other Contaminants Detected
1,4-Dioxane
Atrazine*
Barium
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Fluoride
Manganese
Molybdenum
Strontium*
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.