Overview
Legal does not necessarily equal safe.
- Getting a passing grade from the federal government does not mean the water meets the latest health guidelines.
- Legal limits for contaminants in tap water have not been updated in almost 20 years.
- The best way to ensure clean tap water is to keep pollution out of source water in the first place.
AquaPura's analysis shows 8 contaminant(s) detected in Indianola Water Supply's water exceed recommended health guidelines, though they may be within legal limits set by the EPA.
Contaminants Detected
This Utility: 0.5 ppb
Legal Limit: 10 ppb
125x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb
0.004 ppb
This Utility: 0.34 ppb
Legal Limit: 5 ppb
3.4x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
0.1 ppb
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.21 ppb
No Legal Limit
11x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
0.02 ppb
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.238 ppb
Legal Limit: 60 ppb
2.4x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
0.1 ppb
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 4.93 ppb
No Legal Limit
82x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
0.06 ppb
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.97 ppb
Legal Limit: 5 ppb
39x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb
0.05 ppb
Trichloroacetic acid
Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.457 ppb
No Legal Limit
4.6x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 0.4 ppb
Legal Limit: 100 ppb
This Utility: 0.23 ppb
Legal Limit: 400 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
200 ppb
200 ppb
This Utility: 0.48 ppb
Legal Limit: 5 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
4 ppb
4 ppb
This Utility: 0.025 ppm
Legal Limit: 10 ppm
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppm
0.14 ppm
Find a Filter
See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.
Carbon Filters
Filters 5 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+7 others)
Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.
Pros
- Lower upfront cost
- Reduced maintenance
Cons
- Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 8 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+18 others)
Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.
Pros
- Most effective
Cons
- Higher upfront cost
- Requires more maintenance
- Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination
Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.
| Contaminant | Activated Carbon | Reverse Osmosis | Ion Exchange |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contaminants Above Health Guidelines | |||
| Arsenic | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Carbon tetrachloride | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Chromium (hexavalent)* | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dichloroacetic acid | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA5) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Haloacetic acids (HAA9)* | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Radium, combined (-226 and -228) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Trichloroacetic acid | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Other Contaminants Detected | |||
| Antimony | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Barium | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cadmium | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Chlorate* | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Chromium (total) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cyanide | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Dichloromethane (methylene chloride) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Fluoride | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Germanium | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Lithium | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Manganese | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Mercury (inorganic) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Monochloroacetic acid | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Nitrate | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Nitrite | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Picloram | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Selenium | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Strontium* | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vanadium* | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
Protect your family's health.
Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.