Water Utility

Manchester Water Department

Location Manchester, Connecticut,
CT
Serves 51,198
Source Surface water
PWS ID CT0770021

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 4 ppb No Legal Limit
67x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 13.3 ppb No Legal Limit
33x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.279 ppb No Legal Limit
14x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
This Utility: 0.13 ppb No Legal Limit
4.3x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.03 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.34 ppb No Legal Limit
13x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 5.59 ppb No Legal Limit
28x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.2 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 11.6 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
116x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 16.2 ppb No Legal Limit
270x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.82 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
13x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 1.63 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
12x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 0.575 ppt Legal Limit: 10 ppb
575x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.001 ppb
This Utility: 2.4 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppb
8x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.3 ppb

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 4.26 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppb
47x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.09 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.35 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
7.1x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 27.9 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
186x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb

Trichloroacetic acid

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 5.7 ppb No Legal Limit
57x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 0.0106 ppb Legal Limit: 200 ppb
This Utility: 0.0351 ppb Legal Limit: 7 ppb

1,2,3-Trichloropropane*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.00065 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.0007 ppb
This Utility: 0.122 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.35 ppb
This Utility: 0.288 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 134.9 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb

Bromate*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.0833 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 15.1 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 0.243 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb
This Utility: 178.9 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
210 ppb
This Utility: 0.0246 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 0.536 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 5.65 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 0.168 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
53 ppb
This Utility: 1.71 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
2000 ppt
This Utility: 0.275 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 1.22 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.838 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.0858 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb

Strontium-90*

Potential Effect: cancer
No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.35 ppb
This Utility: 0.158 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb
This Utility: 36.63 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
400 ppb
This Utility: 0.07 ppb Legal Limit: 20 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.43 ppb
This Utility: 0.707 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 12 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+14 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 16 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+19 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Bromodichloromethane
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Dibromoacetic acid
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloroacetic acid
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Nitrate
Nitrate and nitrite
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Trichloroacetic acid
Other Contaminants Detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane*
1,4-Dioxane
1-Butanol
Barium
Bromate*
Bromide
Bromoform
Chlorate*
Dieldrin
Fluoride
Manganese
Monochloroacetic acid
Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS)
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHPA)
Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)
Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA)
Strontium*
Strontium-90*
Trichloroethylene
Tritium*
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.