Water Utility

Chorro Valley Pipeline - Slo County

Location County, California,
CA
Serves 30,000
Source Purchased surface water
PWS ID CA4010030

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 1.05 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
263x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 14.3 ppb No Legal Limit
239x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 16.9 ppb No Legal Limit
42x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.0475 ppb No Legal Limit
2.4x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
This Utility: 2.13 ppb No Legal Limit
71x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.03 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 9.22 ppb No Legal Limit
92x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 9.67 ppb No Legal Limit
48x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.2 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 36.2 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
362x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 41.3 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
275x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb

Trichloroacetic acid

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 5.5 ppb No Legal Limit
55x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 28.1 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
600 ppb
This Utility: 0.817 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb
This Utility: 0.0482 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 10.8 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 0.295 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
25 ppb
This Utility: 1.4 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
53 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.011 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppm
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppm

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 8 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+3 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 10 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+6 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Bromodichloromethane
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Dibromoacetic acid
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloroacetic acid
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Trichloroacetic acid
Other Contaminants Detected
Aluminum
Bromoform
Fluoride
Manganese
Monobromoacetic acid*
Monochloroacetic acid
Nitrate

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.