Water Utility

Placer County Water Agency - Foothill

Location Placer County, California,
CA
Serves 89,008
Source Surface water
PWS ID CA3110025

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.02 ppb No Legal Limit
34x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 37.2 ppb No Legal Limit
93x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.0854 ppb No Legal Limit
4.3x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
This Utility: 11.4 ppb No Legal Limit
57x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.2 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 36.2 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
362x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 28.1 ppb No Legal Limit
468x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.383 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
2.7x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 39.3 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
262x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb

Trichloroacetic acid

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 15.7 ppb No Legal Limit
157x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 8.54 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
600 ppb
This Utility: 250 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
210 ppb
This Utility: 0.28 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 0.0298 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
25 ppb
This Utility: 0.408 ppb Legal Limit: 50 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
30 ppb
This Utility: 0.0402 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb
This Utility: 0.246 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 7 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+1 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 9 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+4 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Bromodichloromethane
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Dichloroacetic acid
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Nitrate
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Trichloroacetic acid
Other Contaminants Detected
Aluminum
Chlorate*
Manganese
Monobromoacetic acid*
Selenium
Strontium*
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.