Water Utility

Orchard Dale Water District

Location Los Angeles County, California,
CA
Serves 25,000
Source Purchased groundwater
PWS ID CA1910101

Overview

Contaminants Detected

This Utility: 0.873 ppb No Legal Limit
2.5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.35 ppb

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 3.19 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
796x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.931 ppb No Legal Limit
16x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
This Utility: 3.15 ppb No Legal Limit
6.3x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.45 ppb No Legal Limit
3.6x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.533 ppb No Legal Limit
27x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
This Utility: 1.47 ppb No Legal Limit
49x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.03 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 3.18 ppb No Legal Limit
32x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 36.2 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
362x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.96 ppb No Legal Limit
49x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 3.66 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
26x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 3.47 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
25x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 0.22 ppt No Legal Limit
37x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.006 ppb
This Utility: 5.37 ppt Legal Limit: 10 ppb
5,368x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.001 ppb
This Utility: 2.56 ppt Legal Limit: 10 ppb
426x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.006 ppb
This Utility: 11.3 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppb
38x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.3 ppb

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 5.25 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppb
58x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.09 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.7 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
14x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 8.71 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
58x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb
This Utility: 2.44 ppb Legal Limit: 20 ppb
5.7x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.43 ppb
This Utility: 11.9 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
600 ppb
This Utility: 44.9 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 45.9 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
210 ppb
This Utility: 0.414 ppb Legal Limit: 100 ppb
This Utility: 0.0438 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.2 ppb
This Utility: 0.219 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 0.425 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 0.11 ppb Legal Limit: 2 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
1.2 ppb
This Utility: 2.04 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
40 ppb
This Utility: 7.35 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
2000 ppt
This Utility: 9.63 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 1.48 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 4.92 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 6.72 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.157 ppb Legal Limit: 50 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
30 ppb
This Utility: 0.723 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb

Trichloroacetic acid

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.0667 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 6.59 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 13 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+8 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 19 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+15 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
1,4-Dioxane
Arsenic
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Dibromoacetic acid
Dibromochloromethane
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Nitrate
Nitrate and nitrite
Perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA)
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Other Contaminants Detected
Aluminum
Barium
Chlorate*
Chromium (total)
Dichloroacetic acid
Fluoride
Manganese
Mercury (inorganic)
Molybdenum
Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS)
Perfluorobutanoic Acid (PFBA)
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHPA)
Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)
Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA)
Selenium
Strontium*
Trichloroacetic acid
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.