Water Utility

Los Angeles County WW District 4 & 34-Lancaster

Location Los Angeles County, California,
CA
Serves 204,393
Source Purchased surface water
PWS ID CA1910070

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 4.79 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
1,197x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Bromate*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.21 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
22x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 5.6 ppb No Legal Limit
93x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
This Utility: 7.38 ppb No Legal Limit
15x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 2.79 ppb No Legal Limit
7x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 8.02 ppb No Legal Limit
401x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
This Utility: 3.52 ppb No Legal Limit
117x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.03 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 10 ppb No Legal Limit
100x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 2.16 ppb No Legal Limit
11x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.2 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 36.2 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
362x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 16.4 ppb No Legal Limit
274x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.55 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
11x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 0.897 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
6.4x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 1.06 ppt Legal Limit: 10 ppb
1,059x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.001 ppb

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.613 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppb
6.8x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.09 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.18 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
3.6x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 25.9 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
172x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb

Trichloroacetic acid

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.25 ppb No Legal Limit
13x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 2.05 ppb Legal Limit: 20 ppb
4.8x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.43 ppb
This Utility: 0.483 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1 ppt
This Utility: 1.46 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
600 ppb
This Utility: 35.7 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 0.00108 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
This Utility: 46.2 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
210 ppb
This Utility: 9.34 ppb Legal Limit: 100 ppb
This Utility: 0.34 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 0.00846 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 1.3 ppb No Legal Limit
This Utility: 0.749 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 3.99 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
40 ppb
This Utility: 0.396 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
25 ppb
This Utility: 0.0469 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
53 ppb
This Utility: 1.34 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
2000 ppt
This Utility: 1.24 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.404 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 4.22 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.573 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1 ppt
This Utility: 3.23 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 0.352 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb
This Utility: 15.5 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 13 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+10 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 18 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+18 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Bromate*
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Dibromoacetic acid
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloroacetic acid
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Nitrate
Nitrate and nitrite
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Trichloroacetic acid
Other Contaminants Detected
6:2 Fluorotelomer Sulfonic Acid (6:2 FTSA)
Aluminum
Barium
Bromochloromethane
Chlorate*
Chromium (total)
Fluoride
Germanium
Lithium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Monobromoacetic acid*
Monochloroacetic acid
Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS)
Perfluorobutanoic Acid (PFBA)
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHPA)
Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)
Perfluoropentane sulfonic acid (PFPeS)
Perfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA)
Strontium*
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.