Water Utility

La Verne WD

Location La Verne, California,
CA
Serves 32,206
Source Purchased surface water
PWS ID CA1910062

Overview

Contaminants Detected

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 0.4 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
100x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Bromodichloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 8.64 ppb No Legal Limit
144x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
This Utility: 6.06 ppb No Legal Limit
12x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb

Chloroform

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 6.63 ppb No Legal Limit
17x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb

Chromium (hexavalent)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.688 ppb No Legal Limit
34x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.02 ppb
This Utility: 3.21 ppb No Legal Limit
107x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.03 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 10 ppb No Legal Limit
100x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 3.24 ppb No Legal Limit
16x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.2 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 36.2 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
362x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 20 ppb No Legal Limit
334x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 13.1 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 6.5 ppb No Legal Limit
6.5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
1 ppb
This Utility: 0.855 ppt Legal Limit: 10 ppb
855x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.001 ppb

Radium, combined (-226 and -228)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.47 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
9.5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.05 ppb

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 31.5 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
210x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb

Trichloroacetic acid

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 1.66 ppb No Legal Limit
17x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 3.19 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
8x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.4 ppb
This Utility: 1.95 ppb Legal Limit: 20 ppb
4.5x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.43 ppb
This Utility: 0.0566 ppb Legal Limit: 7 ppb
This Utility: 0.0309 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.35 ppb
This Utility: 83 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 36.3 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
210 ppb
This Utility: 1.64 ppb Legal Limit: 100 ppb
This Utility: 0.331 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 0.402 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 4.6 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
40 ppb
This Utility: 0.203 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
25 ppb
This Utility: 0.366 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
53 ppb
This Utility: 0.5 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
3 ppt
This Utility: 0.845 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
2000 ppt
This Utility: 0.527 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt
This Utility: 1.58 ppt No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1000 ppt

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.121 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppt
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.09 ppt
This Utility: 0.418 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
1500 ppb

Strontium-90*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.61 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.35 ppb

Tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.0768 ppb Legal Limit: 5 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.06 ppb
This Utility: 195.84 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
400 ppb
This Utility: 4.45 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 12 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+8 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 17 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+16 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
Arsenic
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Chloroform
Chromium (hexavalent)*
Dibromoacetic acid
Dibromochloromethane
Dichloroacetic acid
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Haloacetic acids (HAA9)*
Nitrate
Perchlorate*
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Trichloroacetic acid
Trichloroethylene
Other Contaminants Detected
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,4-Dioxane
Barium
Chlorate*
Chromium (total)
Fluoride
Manganese
Molybdenum
Monobromoacetic acid*
Monochloroacetic acid
N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA)
Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS)
Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHPA)
Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Strontium*
Strontium-90*
Tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene)
Tritium*
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.