Water Utility

Bakman Water Company

Location Fresno County, California,
CA
Serves 17,393
Source Groundwater
PWS ID CA1010001

Overview

Contaminants Detected

1,2,3-Trichloropropane*

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.00263 ppb No Legal Limit
3.8x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.0007 ppb

1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.0574 ppb Legal Limit: 0.2 ppb
34x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.0017 ppb

Arsenic

Potential Effect: Over Legal Limit
This Utility: 1.86 ppb Legal Limit: 10 ppb
465x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.004 ppb

Haloacetic acids (HAA5)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 36.2 ppb Legal Limit: 60 ppb
362x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb

Nitrate

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 7.02 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
50x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 3.14 ppm Legal Limit: 10 ppb
22x
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.14 ppb
This Utility: 42 ppb Legal Limit: 2000 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
700 ppb
This Utility: 0.167 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.5 ppb

Dibromochloromethane

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.0147 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.1 ppb
This Utility: 0.074 ppm Legal Limit: 4 ppm
This Utility: 8.9 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
100 ppb
This Utility: 0.131 ppt Legal Limit: 4 ppt
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.3 ppt

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Potential Effect: cancer
This Utility: 0.184 ppb Legal Limit: 80 ppb
EWG's Health Guideline:
0.15 ppb
This Utility: 10.3 ppb No Legal Limit
EWG's Health Guideline:
21 ppb

Find a Filter

See which water filtration technologies are effective at reducing the contaminants detected in this utility's water supply.

Carbon Filters
Filters 3 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+4 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Lower upfront cost
  • Reduced maintenance
Cons
  • Does not remove all contaminants
Reverse Osmosis
Filters 6 contaminants exceeding guidelines (+6 others)

Can reduce the levels of many common contaminants.

Pros
  • Most effective
Cons
  • Higher upfront cost
  • Requires more maintenance
  • Wastes water
Other Considerations
Ion Exchange
PROS: Softens hard water, Reduces some contaminants
CONS: Doesn't remove all contaminants
Whole-House Filters
PROS: Useful for reducing radiologicals and TCE
CONS: Expensive to install and maintain, Risk of bacterial contamination

Explore filter options for each contaminant. See which technologies are effective at reducing specific contaminants.

Contaminant Activated Carbon Reverse Osmosis Ion Exchange
Contaminants Above Health Guidelines
1,2,3-Trichloropropane*
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
Arsenic
Haloacetic acids (HAA5)
Nitrate
Nitrate and nitrite
Other Contaminants Detected
Barium
Bromoform
Dibromochloromethane
Fluoride
Manganese
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)
Vanadium*

Protect your family's health.

Don't wait for your utility to improve. Get a free water analysis from AquaPura and find the right filtration system for your home.